Sources, /macros/latex/required/psnfss. Documentation. README · Package documentation · Readme. Version, a. Licenses, The LaTeX Project Public. They are the same fonts. That is, the Font Catalogue also lists alternatives and extensions etc., but the basic fonts it lists are the ones you. Having read any LATEX introduction of your choice (for instance, ), you able in every LATEX distribution as a PDF file named
|Published (Last):||28 January 2015|
|PDF File Size:||7.89 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.42 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Which fonts are used for the 35 PostScript fonts is configured in your TeX installation.
If you wanted to use Adobe’s Palatino, you’d need to obtain it, install it and reconfigure your TeX installation’s font configuration appropriately. I noticed that the font packages within the postscript psnfss universal to all TeX distributions aren’t listed in the LaTeX Font Catalogue.
Sign up using Facebook.
Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Here is the relevant section:. Adobe fonts with “berry” filenames e. I figure the font packages listed in the Catalog are superior or have had additional work and refinements applied.
Is that the case and should I use the alternatives from the Catalog rather than from psnfss? Sign up using Email and Password. More specifically, the packages support either clones from URW or versions from Adobe, depending on your font configuration. So, in general, the Font Catalogue will give you a ‘best practice’ method for enabling a font.
Adobe fonts with “vendor” filenames e. URW fonts with “vendor” filenames e.
In others, the packages from PSNFSS are not generally the best way to access psnfs2e font because a more complete solution is now provided by a newer package e.
It seems that the ones in the Catalog have replacements for the ones inside psnfss. They are the same fonts. Now, formally this would give you Adobe Palatino, but, in practice, you probably don’t have this font available. Here is the relevant section: Email Required, but never shown.
psnfss – Font support for common PostScript fonts
So what you actually get is URW Palladiol, upl. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. The packages are different, for example, the catalog has Palladio a clone of Palitino, which is in psnfss Other examples are, for New Century Schoolbook: What PSNFSS actually provides are clones of the fonts listed unless you have installed alternatives and configured your installation to use them.
But the default is to use the clones which are part of TeX installations. Many font packages use different combinations of these base fonts. URW fonts with “berry” filenames e.
LW35 Which fonts for the “Basic 35 Laserwriter Fonts” do you want to use and how are the filenames chosen? But the improvement is not in the fonts used – these are often identical – but, rather, in the way those fonts are configured and accessed.
For example, mathpazo essentially sets the font family ppl for the default serif. The Font Catalogue tends to list packages which provide more complete support e. It seems that the ones in the Catalog have replacements for the ones inside psnfss, The packages are different, for example, the catalog has Palladio a clone of Palitino, which is in psnfss Other examples are, for New Century Schoolbook: