For hot-dip galvanizing applications, it is possible to measure and verify the steel surface profile according to ASTM D, Standard Test. ASTM D – 11 Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read. ASME B, Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay); ASTM D, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast.

Author: Meztilar Brar
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 18 July 2008
Pages: 465
PDF File Size: 13.24 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.13 Mb
ISBN: 477-6-13881-839-8
Downloads: 18020
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulutaxe

Larger repair areas or prepared hot-dip galvanized surfaces for painting can be measured with two readings taken from a minimum of three, 6×6 inch 15×15 cm areas.

Measure the thickness of the tape compressed foam and non-compressible plastic?

Work Item s – proposed revisions of this standard. Same Surface, Different Results?

What is Surface Profile and Why is it Necessary? The base of the instrument rests on the peaks of the surface profile while the cone-shaped point projects into the valley. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.

At each location make ten readings and determine the mean. Typically, the higher the coating thickness the greater the surface profile depth. Inspection Instruments Pipeline Coatings — Volume 2: The instruments described are readily portable and sufficiently sturdy for use in the? The standard does not address discarding outliers, but an update to the standard addressing outlier readings is planned.

Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility. This material provides general information only and is not intended as a substitute for competent professional examination and verification as to suitability and applicability.


For measurements that fall between tape sizes, it is still required that two readings using each tape are to be averaged to comprise one reading i. Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard Work Item s – proposed revisions of this standard Translated Version s: Originally approved in ICS Number Code Therefore, differences are inevitable, particularly with deeper surface profiles, and the results may or may not fall within the specified range for one of the two methods.

A superscript epsilon e indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. This is done because of evidence that coatings performance in any one small area is primarily in?

Updates to ASTM D | American Galvanizer’s Association

Awtm values given in parentheses are for information only. This can be discussed and agreed upon at the pre-construction conference. Models from a few gage manufacturers are available that conform to this standard. While both the depth micrometer and replica tape methods conform to ASTM D, the measurement acquisition principles are quite different.

Updates to ASTM D4417

Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee,1which you may attend Copyright? The mode is determined with the comparator of Test Method A. A burnishing tool is used c4417 impress the foam face of the tape into the surface to create a reverse replica of the pro? ASTM D contains three methods of measuring surface profile depth: Your email address will not be published.

Differences in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D4417- Method B vs. Method C

At each location make three readings and determine the mean. These changes reflect industry research on current tooling which revealed averaged measurements are consistently less than the values obtained using replica tape. Each r4417 is marked giving the nominal pro? Today, Method B and Method C are the most commonly used, so that is what we will be focusing on.

  ISO 16000-3 PDF

The height of a single valley below a plane at the level of the highest surrounding peaks is measured with the?

NOTE 1—Optical microscope methods serve as a referee method for surface pro? So, in effect the reading on the micrometer or the RTR from the replica tape represents several peaks and valleys, while the depth micrometer does not. Report the range of results from all locations as the surface pro? The base of the instrument rests on the tops of the peaks of the surface pro? Once the burnishing process is complete, the replica tape is removed from the surface and the image is measured using a spring-loaded micrometer.

Leave this field empty. There are additional techniques suitable for laboratory use not covered by dd4417 test methods.

Difference in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D Method B vs CKTA University

During abrasive blast cleaning, the mass of the abrasive and the velocity of the abrasive movement created by compressed air generates kinetic energy the abrasive can reach speeds of over miles per hour as it exits the blast nozzle. The measurements must conform to the minimum and maximum surface profile requirements listed in the project specification.

The instruments described are readily portable and sufficiently sturdy for use in the field. Standards for Measurement of Surface Profile. It is the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters.

The three test methods described within D for measuring surface profile include visual comparators, surface profile depth micrometers, and replica tape.

For this reason, surface pro?